10.14489/td.2015.05.pp.059-068

2015, 05 May

DOI: 10.14489/td.2015.05.pp.059-068

Badalyan V.G., Bazulin A.E., Bazulin E.G., Samarin P.F., Tikhonov D.S.
DEVELOPMENT AND CERTIFICATION OF ULTRASONIC INSPECTION PROCEDURES WITH USE OF SOFTWARE CIVA
(pp. 59-68)

Abstract. It is shown the main field of application of CIVA software as auxiliary tools for the development and certification of ultrasonic inspection procedures. It is represented the results of the inspection by Tandem method obtained with experiments and modeling. The article gives examples of the use of modeling for inspection of parameters in an object of complex shape with use of antenna arrays. It is evaluated efficiency of the selected control scheme by measurements on the test sample. It is reported the results of calculations of conformity assessment procedures products requirements of reference (detection of flaws lo-calized in the area of control; POD-curve).

Keywords:

+ - About the Authors Click to collapse

V. G. Badalyan, A. E. Bazulin, E. G. Bazulin, P. F. Samarin, D. S. Tikhonov
Co Ltd. “Scientific Production Center of Nondestructive Ultrasonic Testing “ECHO+”, Moscow, Russia. Е-mail: bvg @ echoplus.ru

+ - References Click to collapse

1. Typical requirements for the development of tech-nical specifications, testing and application of means and methods of nondestructive testing on atomic energy objects. (2005). Guidance documents No. RD EO 0487–05. Moscow. Concern «Rosenergoatom».
2. The European method of certification in nondestructive testing. (1997). Report ENIQ No. 2 EUR RU 17299. European Commission. Brussels-Luxembourg.
3. European methodology for qualification of non-destructive testing. 3 rd is. (2007). Report ENIQ No. 31 EUR 22906 EN. Luxembourg.
4. Methodology for certification of the systems for in-service inspection of nuclear power plants with water-moderated energy reactors. (1998). IAEA document No. IAEA-EBP-WWER-11.
5. Recommended practice 6: The use of modeling in inspection qualification. 1 is. (1999). Report ENIQ No. 15 EUR 19017 EN ENIQ. Brussels-Luxembourg.
6. Official site ANSYS. Available at: http://www. ansys.com/
7. Basov K. A. (2009). Ansys for designers. Moscow: DMK Press.
8. Official site COMSOL. Available at: http://www. comsol.com/; http://www.humusoft.com/produkty/comsol/ru/
9. Official site of UMASIS software product. Available at: .http://www.tno.nl/content.cfm?context=thema&content =inno_case&laag1=895&laag2=911&item_id=444&Taal=2
10. Official site CIVA. Available at: http://www. extende.com/civa-3
11. Official site I3D. Available at: http://www. utex.com
12. Official site UTSIM. Available at: http://www. ndt-ed.org/EducationResources/ CommunityCollege/Ultraso-nics/ CalibrationMeth/utsim.htm.
13. Wirdelius H., Blomquist A. (1998). The application of mathematical modeling of ultrasonic NDT in the qualification process [J/OL]. Available at: http://www.ndt.net/article /ecndt98/reliability/ 323/323.htm, 1998-11/2007-06-06.
14. Munikoti V. K. (2001). On the propagation of elastic waves in acoustically anisotropic austenitic materials and at their boundaries during nondestructive inspection with ultrasound. Research Report No. 249 of the Federal Institute for Material Research and Testing (BAM). Berlin, Bremerha-ven – Germany.NDT.net – June 2001, Vol. 6 No. 6.
15. Attestation passport of the software product No. 329. (2013). Moscow, Rostekhnadzor, FBU «NTTs IaRB»
16. Brekhovskikh L. M. (Eds.). (1974). Ocean acoustics. Moscow: Nauka.
17. Kravtsev Iu. A., Orlov Iu. I. (1980). Geometrical optics of inhomogeneous media. Moscow: Nauka.
18. Leger Alain, Deschamps Marc (Eds.). (2009). Ultrasonic wave propagation in non homogeneous media series. Springer Proceedings in Physics, 128(X).
19. Borovikov V. A., Kinber B. E. (1978). Geometric theory of diffraction. Moscow: Sviaz'.
20. Huang R., Schmerr L., Sedov A. (2006). A modified Born approximation for scattering in isotropic and aniso-tropic elastic solids. Journal of Nondestructive Evalua-tion, 25(3), pp. 139-154. doi: 10.1063/1.2184510
21. Berens A. P., Hovey P. W. (1981). Evaluation of NDE Reliability Characterization. AFWAL-TR-81-4160. V. 1 Air Force Wright Aeronautical Laboratories, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio.
22. Guidelines for the assessment of the reliability of the means and methods of nondestructive testing. (2005). Guidance documents No. RD EO 0488–03. Moscow. Concern «Rosenergoatom».
23. Georgiou G. (2006). Probability of Detection (PoD) curves – Derivation, applications and limitations: HSE Re-search Report 454.

+ - Purchase digital version of a single article Click to collapse

This article is available in electronic format (PDF).

DOI: 10.14489/td.2015.05.pp.059-068

Copy the article DOI and follow the link https://id-spektr.ru/product/pokupka-elektronnoy-stati-iz-zhurnala-kontrol-diagnostika

Please specify the article DOI in the order comments.